Showing posts with label lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawyers. Show all posts

Monday, March 21, 2011

Colleagues: Karma and Lawyer Jokes

It seems my karma of the last 30 years is to be tracked by a series of lawyer jokes.  There is a deep cultural angst about lawyers:  we love them, hate them, hold them in high regard, and villify them.  We don't seem neutral about them. 

I confess, I am not neutral about them either.  The fact is that they are part of my professional family.  I should not be neutral.  Like any family, we are a mix of the healthy and the dysfunctional.  Becauses much of what we do is in the public eye, our flaws are all the more visible, as might be our occasional virtues.

I find reassuring that our great men, e.g., Lincoln or Adams, and our first African-American president, were first lawyers.  There is after all something good in the law, and good men seem to gravitate to it.  It is true too that scoundrels may seek to use the law for their purposes as well, but overall, it is our respect for the law, if not the the lawyers who apply it, that distinguishes us as a free people. 

On a more mundane and personal level, I like the lawyers I work with generally.  They are far and away more intelligent, more articulate, and more disciplined than many of the other people I know.  They are steadfast in their work, and dependable generally.  They are able to deal with stressful and complex situations, and reach conclusions.  The best of them are people of both heart and brain, caring deeply.  Today, for example, I worked with a lawyer on a volunteer basis who is on a committee to select speakers for our professional organization.  He took inititative, he needed little monitoring or reminding, he located and selected outstanding speakers, and he was pleasant and responsive through it all.  And, he was not unusual--this attitude and diligence is typical of the twelve members on the committee. 

If we as lawyers have a "PR problem" with the public, we probably deserve it, but not because of the failings of the majority, but the because the majority are not as visible in their virtues as the minority in their vices.  The fault is with us, as lawyers.  As a profession, we need a compelling vision of our elevated ethical and moral role in society.  We need to articulate and follow a vision of a high social calling of service, humanity, warmth, and compassion for fellow citizens.  Our essential flaw is our selfish pursuit of our own interests.  The public justly has come to distrust us if it thinks we are exploitive and abusive. 

My professional organization, the Labor and Employment Law Section of the Orange County Bar Asssociation collects and delivers food each month to a county wide food bank.  Last month we collected toys and pledges for Children's Hospital of Orange County.  As I get to know the members of the Section personally, I am discovering the goodness each of them brings to the network.  These persons are people of good character, and concern for others.  They are first persons with struggles and dreams, like us all, and then lawyers.

I think the public responds with strong negativity to lawyers at times because they want so to believe in us as "priests of the law."  We lawyers are given monopolies, with special status and opportunity.  The public justly expects us to honor our position by "good work" and "noble actions."  I can live up to that expectation.  So can my colleagues.  In fact, many of them do.  

 
"If the pink slip doesn't fit, get redressed!"
Click to see my wardrobe of remedies. Link

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Lingual Influenza

Paper, boxes of it, volumes of words strung with alleged significance, page after page--this is the "fat" of litigation.  I believe that in the legal world, brevity is like gold, valuable, and seldom seen.  

I frankly (since I am always "Frank") do not know if the advent of electronic filing and transmission will help or hinder in the big picture.  When manual typewriters were in use, people produced fewer pages, I think, just because the process of creating them was slower and more difficult.  Likewise, loading and carrying paper around, or having to store it, [if you are a court house administrator], has a way of imposing page limitations.

But now, the storage and volume is practically unlimited.  I have a cynical feeling that the volume will expand to fill our nearly unlimited capacity.  We are wordsmiths with lingual influenza, drowning in our own words.

"If the pink slip doesn't fit, get redressed!"
Click to see my wardrobe of remedies. Link

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Forgiveness in Personal and Public Discourse.

"Civility Is Not a Sign of Weakness."  John F. Kennedy.

I meet monthly with a group of judges and lawyers for breakfast in a group known as "Daniel's Inn".  We sit in a local Coco's, order from a menu we now know by heart, and spend about an hour discussing the stresses of our profession from a spiritual perspective.  Our motto is "You Are Not Alone".   Because we are Christian lawyers, we understand that we are not alone because God is with us, and we have one another as a community of believers.

This morning's topic was generally how do we deal with the stress of often  antagonistic differences we have with those who do not see the world as we do.  There is no single answer we are given from these meetings.  It is a time of dialogue and exploration.  We share our personal stories of events that illustrate our own struggles, victories, and failings.  Over the years, the value of a "good meeting" I find is whether I continue to think about the issues after the meeting is over.  Then there is a possibility of new insight and change.

My reflections from this morning lead me to observe how relational I am.  I am wired for relations, and my physical, emotional, and mental health are all greatly influenced by how successfully I am connecting to other people.  My connections, business and personal,  can be so different than I in outlook, culture, values, dreams, interests, and personality.

These persons are the agents of my growth and happiness, just as I am for them.  The result of this "wiring for relationship" is that if my relationships are filled with anger, frustration, deprivation, insult, tension, or exhaustion, my physical health itself will ultimately collapse.  That is why so many of my clients come to me after a period of hostility at work with high blood pressure, anxiety, depression, and anger.  Just as often, after months away from the distressing environment, they express relief to be away, despite the new stresses of unemployment.

I'm tempted now to flippantly ask:  "Can't we all just get along?"  The answer of course is no.  There inevitably will be conflict, hurt, and injustice in our relationships at work.  We experience the same dilemma even in our homes as we desperately need and yet do not receive the close, intimate connection we need from family members.  The challenge is to embrace the reality that relationships don't always function at the level of the ideal.  Then we can begin to work with the reality to improve those relationships.

The topic this morning at Daniel's Inn was "forgiveness."  I came to see, as I drove to my office this morning reflecting on the topic, that forgiveness is part of the process of "embracing the reality" of inevitable tensions in our relationships.  We fail one another.  We fail ourselves.  Everyday, we fail, falling short of being the "perfect" persons most of us strive to be.  Clients lie to me.  Judges operate from cynicism and bias.  Opposing counsel plays games, and obstructs legitimate discovery.  The court's research attorney misconstrues the law.  I fail to be as aggressive or foresightful as I need to be in a case. Morality means something completely different to one generation than to another.   We fail as surely as we breathe.  It is the human condition.

I saw today that forgiveness is the lubricant by which failing people are able to move past their failures to create better relationships.  Forgiveness is not agreement.  Forgiveness is not forgetfulness.  Forgiveness is not lack of self-protection.  Forgiveness, I think, is born out of two characteristics:  compassion and humility.  Compassion, because we see that "hurt people hurt people" and humility because we do not put ourselves in the position of God to condemn other people,  We can be humble because we can look at how we ourselves fail so often.

When we forgive, we give up vindication and hatred, we release resentment, and we open up a space in the relationship for reconciliation and peace.  The result may be that we experience better physical, emotional and spiritual health.  We discover that our resentment has "been a poison we drank, expecting the other person to die."  

"If the pink slip doesn't fit,
get redressed!"
Click to see my wardrobe of remedies.

Link

Revamping your job-search strategy

MSNBC.com

Revamping your job-search strategy
If you’re not landing interviews, it’s time to try something new
By Eve Tahmincioglu
msnbc.com contributor
updated 4:31 p.m. PT, Sun., Feb. 28, 2010

Stephen Cobain was laid off from his executive position at a major Pittsburgh financial services company in December of 2008 and spent nearly a year looking for a job with little to show for it.

“I was doing all the things everyone tells you to do,” he said. “I prepared my résumé, wrote letters, contacted recruiters, looked on all the job boards, responded to 400 positions and maybe sent out 1,500 résumés.”

It all led to no job, just frustration.
Until this past Thanksgiving, when his always-supportive wife stunned him by saying: “You must accept the fact that you’re doing something wrong.”

“My reaction was to say, ‘I think I’m doing everything right. The right thing will come along,’ ” Cobain recalled. “And her response to me was, ‘It hasn’t come along yet.’ ”

It’s hard to hear this type of criticism, especially when you feel you’re doing everything in your power to land a job. And clearly, most job seekers have a great excuse right now — a crummy economy.
But if you’ve been job searching for months with few tangible results, it may be time to take a hard look at yourself in the job-hunter’s mirror.

A change of strategy

That’s just what Cobain did.

Instead of wearing pajamas, he started dressing in a suit every day to go to his home office. He stopped searching the job boards. He hired a financial services placement firm and a career coach.

The placement firm led to just one phone call back from an employer. However, he said the career coach he found through Guerrilla Job Search International helped him focus his search. The coach aided him in revamping his résumé, taking it from three and a half pages to one page, and ditching the job-chronology format for a list of his major career accomplishments. The coach also advised him to target an assortment of companies he would like to work for even if they had no advertised job openings.

“I mailed out 10 résumés, got eight interviews and got three job offers,” he said.

Today, he starts his new job as senior vice president for a financial services firm in Pittsburgh.

New networking approach

Valentina Janek has been looking for work for nine months since she was laid off from her job as chief marketing officer for an investment company on Long Island.

Janek is a consummate networker, and even started a networking group for the unemployed called the Long Island Breakfast Club, which now has more than 800 members. But she recently realized she needed to start networking with top executives of companies, not just hiring managers or administrative people.

“My newest strategy is to meet every president I can. Go from the top down,” she said, with a goal of meeting five company executives a month.

She’s gotten herself invited to corporate functions and political events where business leaders are in attendance. “I went to an awards event where a president was the honoree,” she said. “I bought him a book and gave it to him there and got his business card.” As a result, she landed several interviews at the company.

While she didn’t get the job and is still looking for one, she said the new approach reignited her job search.

Knowing what’s not working

There isn’t a cookie-cutter, job-search strategy that fits everyone, but the key is knowing when the old techniques aren’t working.

“Trying something new is a matter of being able to persevere and not give up, stick to the job search and keep active,” said Tim Schoonover, chairman of outplacement company OI Partners in Cincinnati. “It's when the job search starts becoming inactive, and you begin to lose interest in it, that you need to try something different.”

He provided some warning signs that you may be in a job-hunting slump:


  • You aren't landing job interviews or informational interviews.



  • You aren't learning anything new about possible employers and job opportunities.



  • Your enthusiasm for the job hunt is waning.



  • You haven't been outside for three days.








  • Another reason to drastically change your job-hunt strategy is “if you realize that there aren’t any available positions within your field that you qualify for,” said Paul Klein, director of the Career Services Center at Cleveland State University.

    It may also come down to mistakes you’re making during the application process.

    “Approximately 60 percent of the people that apply for government jobs fill out the application incorrectly,” he said. “By alternating their strategy, even by simply buying a book or going on a Web site that instructs people how to successfully apply for a government job, it can make a huge difference.”

    Target 20 companies

    David Perry, co-founder of Guerrilla Job Search and author of “Guerrilla Marketing for Job Hunters 2.0,” advised job seekers to create their own private job market by making a list of 20 companies they’d like to work for. “Or Google phrases such as, ‘best companies for minorities’ or ‘most admired employers in Texas’ to help refine your search.”

    In addition, he suggested that job seekers:


  • Get each company’s mailing address and phone number — they’re often on the Web site — and the name, title and contact information of the person who can offer you a job.



  • Send that person your résumé and a cover letter, which should be tailored to the company specifically, and include a postscript at the bottom.



  • Send your résumé through UPS, FedEx or two-day mail, and ask to be notified by e-mail when it’s been signed for.



  • Once you get that e-mail, wait about 30 minutes. Then, pick up the phone and call the person. 



  • Whether you get them personally, or a voicemail recording, say, “Hi, this is so-and-so. I see you just received my package. I’d like to meet with you for coffee to talk about how I can help your company achieve X, Y, and Z.”


  • And if you still haven’t joined to cyber networking world, it may be time.

    “LinkedIn is an important site for job hunters. So, create a profile if you don’t have one, and use it to post your résumé, articles you’ve written, key PowerPoint presentations you’ve created and so on,” Perry said.

    A creative approach

    Mary Berman, one of Perry’s clients, was laid off in February 2009 after 12 years in the publishing industry. She tried different tactics to get a foot in the door, including creating baseball cards with her picture on the front and a résumé  on the back.

    Alas, nothing worked.

    “By August I was starting to feel beaten up because I wasn’t getting anywhere,” she said. Then she decided to try something new.

    Perry suggested she send a Starbucks paper cup with her résumé and cover letter rolled inside to a company she was interested in working for and deliver it personally. She included a note that said, “I’d like to discuss what I can bring to you over a cup of coffee.”

    Within two hours, she got a call. “She told me she didn’t have a position but wanted to thank me for being so creative,” Berman said.

    Her second attempt with the cup at another company scored her an interview. After the interview, she sent the hiring manager a 60-day plan of what she’d do for the company if she were hired.
    In November, she was offered a job and is now a marketing executive assistant for InStar Services in Detroit, a disaster recovery company.

    “If you want to stand out, you have to get creative,” she said. “You have to use a new approach.”
    URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35605070/ns/business-careers/page/2/

    © 2010 MSNBC.com

    "If the pink slip doesn't fit,
    get redressed!"
    Click to see my wardrobe of remedies.

    Link



    Friday, March 05, 2010

    More Men Filing Sexual Harassment Claims

    Percentage of complaints filed by men has doubled over last 20 years

    By Sam Hananel
    The Associated Press

    updated 1:14 p.m. PT, Thurs., March. 4, 2010

    WASHINGTON - Jonathan Pilkington's boss wouldn't take no for an answer.

    During more than two years as a food runner at an upscale steakhouse in Scottsdale, Ariz., Pilkington says his male supervisor groped, fondled and otherwise sexually harassed him more than a dozen times.

    "It was very embarrassing," Pilkington said. "I felt like I had to do something because the situation was just so bad."

    Now Pilkington, a married father of two, is the star witness in a federal lawsuit against Fleming's Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar and one of a growing number of men claiming they are victims of sexual harassment in the workplace.

    From 1990 to 2009, the percentage of sexual harassment claims filed by men has doubled from 8 percent to 16 percent of all claims, according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
    Women still file the overwhelming majority of sexual harassment claims with the EEOC and state and local agencies. But lawyers at the commission say they've noticed the increase in complaints by men — more than 2,000 were filed in 2009 out of about 12,700 cases.

    Male claims made up about 12 percent of all cases a decade ago, but the percentage has continued to rise even as the overall number of sexual harassment complaints has declined. And last year, the percentage of lawsuits the EEOC filed on behalf of male victims hit an all-time high, making up 14 percent of all cases.

    "It's certainly possible that there's more sexual harassment of men going on, but it could just be that more men are coming forward and complaining about it," said Ernest Haffner, an attorney in the EEOC's Office of Legal Counsel.

    While some cases allege harassment by female supervisors or co-workers, most charges involve men harassing other men. Sometimes it's unwelcome romantic advances. Other times, men are picked on because they are gay, perceived as being gay or not considered masculine enough for the work setting.
    In the past, some employers might have shrugged off such antics as "boys will be boys" horseplay or fraternity-type behavior. But the EEOC has been filing more lawsuits involving male victims, saying it wants to send a message that such behavior is unacceptable and unlawful.

    In November, for example, the Cheesecake Factory restaurant chain agreed to pay $345,000 to six male employees who claimed they were repeatedly sexually assaulted by a group of male kitchen staffers at a Phoenix-area restaurant.

    The EEOC said the abusers would drag some victims kicking and screaming into a walk-in refrigerator, touching and grinding against the victims' genitals and take turns simulating rape. The company denied the allegations but agreed to make a financial settlement and educate its employees and managers about sexual harassment.

    Susan Strauss, a consultant who advises companies about how to avoid sexual harassment in the workplace, said she's seeing more cases in which men are subject to a sexualized form of hazing.
    "If you don't fit the masculine stereotype or are viewed as effeminate, you get picked on in a sexual way to demean you," Strauss said.

    Cases involving women making unwanted advances toward men may also be rising as women make up a growing part of the work force. Last year, the Regal Entertainment Group, which operates a national chain of movie theaters, agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit by a male employee who claimed a female co-worker repeatedly grabbed his crotch at work.

    When the employee complained to his supervisor and the theater's then-general manager, he claims, she failed to stop the harassment and instead retaliated against the victim with unfair discipline and lower performance evaluations.

    The number of cases filed by men has grown steadily since a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 1998 held that same-sex harassment is a valid claim under federal anti-discrimination laws. That ruling involved an offshore oil rig worker who said he was subject to humiliating sex-related treatment by other workers, including being sodomized in the shower with a bar of soap.

    In Pilkington's case, he claims the restaurant's chef would grope and pinch his genitals or grab his backside when Pilkington walked to the kitchen or stock room. Despite his complaints to the restaurant's operating partner, he says the conduct didn't stop.

    After one incident, Pilkington lost his composure and yelled at the chef, making a scene. Days later, he was fired — an action he claims was retaliation for his complaints. An EEOC lawsuit on behalf of Pilkington and three other current and former employees is pending.

    "I think maybe it's just harder for males to come out and file a complaint because of how embarrassing it is," Pilkington said. "When I talk about it I get this nauseous feeling in my stomach."

    The restaurant has denied the charges. In a statement, the company that owns Fleming's said the restaurant "has always been committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace free of harassment for all of its associates."

    Many victims are hesitant to come forward because they are afraid of being considered unmanly or being derided by co-workers, said Mary Jo O'Neill, a regional attorney in the EEOC's Phoenix District office.

    "All sexual harassment victims feel humiliated, lacking control and power," O'Neill said. "This has a different twist because everyone expects that they would be able to handle it and take care of it themselves."

    Pilkington has since moved on to another job. While he is embarrassed by the publicity his case has received, he says it was the right thing to do. The EEOC lawsuit seeks damages for him and other workers alleging harassment, along with back pay and compensatory and punitive damages.


    © 2010 MSNBC.com

    "If the pink slip doesn't fit,
    get redressed!"
    Click to see my wardrobe of remedies.
    Link

    Most Stressful Jobs


    Taken from MSNBC:

    FIRST:  Surgeons top the list of most stressful jobs because their work can be physically demanding, require meeting tough deadlines and involve life or death situations.

    By the way, the least stressful jobs are actuary, dietitian, computer systems analyst, statistician, astronomer, mathematician, historian, and software engineer, according to CareerCast.

    The jobs included in the ranking can change annually depending on Surgeons have to stay on their feet for long hours at a time and often have many people dependent upon them.

    That goes for surgeons who work in small-town hospitals as well as in big cities.

    SECOND:  Few events can ever be as stressful as trying to land a plane full of passengers safely in the Hudson River after a bird strike. That explains why pilots like Chesley Burnett "Sully" Sullenberger, at left in cockpit, rank second on the list.

    Pilots generally have only one chance to correctly take off and land each flight, and the lives of often more than 100 passengers hang in the balance.
    "They have to handle fairly sophisticated technology," Lee said, adding that they have to ready to react at a moment's notice. "Their jobs can be quiet and unstressful for long periods of time and then suddenly it can be the most stressful job on earth."


    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34114804/ns/business-careers

    "If the pink slip doesn't fit,
    get redressed!"
    Click to see my wardrobe of remedies.

    Link